By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Commenting Policy.
Accept
Brisbane DevelopmentBrisbane DevelopmentBrisbane Development
  • Areas
    • Brisbane CBD
    • Northern
    • Southern
    • Eastern
    • Western
    • Gold Coast
    • Sunshine Coast
  • Search by Type
    • Residential
    • Residential BTR
    • Commercial
    • Hotel & Resort
    • Brisbane Retail
    • Entertainment / Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Concepts
    • Industrial
  • SEQ Development Maps
    • Brisbane Development Map
    • Gold Coast Development Map
  • Major Precincts
    • Brisbane Airport
    • Brisbane 2032 Olympics
    • Northshore Hamilton
    • Queen’s Wharf Precinct
    • Waterfront Brisbane
    • Woolloongabba / Brisbane Live Precinct
Search
  • Advertise
© 2026 Brisbane Development Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Reading: $130 Million 27-Storey Tower Proposed for Wynnum CBD
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Brisbane DevelopmentBrisbane Development
  • Areas
  • Search by Type
  • SEQ Development Maps
  • Major Precincts
Search
  • Areas
    • Brisbane CBD
    • Northern
    • Southern
    • Eastern
    • Western
    • Gold Coast
    • Sunshine Coast
  • Search by Type
    • Residential
    • Residential BTR
    • Commercial
    • Hotel & Resort
    • Brisbane Retail
    • Entertainment / Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Concepts
    • Industrial
  • SEQ Development Maps
    • Brisbane Development Map
    • Gold Coast Development Map
  • Major Precincts
    • Brisbane Airport
    • Brisbane 2032 Olympics
    • Northshore Hamilton
    • Queen’s Wharf Precinct
    • Waterfront Brisbane
    • Woolloongabba / Brisbane Live Precinct
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2026 Brisbane Development Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Brisbane Development > Development Areas > Eastern > $130 Million 27-Storey Tower Proposed for Wynnum CBD
Eastern

$130 Million 27-Storey Tower Proposed for Wynnum CBD

Published: 18 May 2022
32 Comments
Share
4 Min Read
Artist's impression of Ora, Wynnum development
Artist's impression of Ora, Wynnum development
SHARE

A development application has been submitted by HamBros Pty Ltd for a 27-storey mixed-use development located at 74 Charlotte Street and 89 Bay Terrace, Wynnum.

Contents
Project RundownPlans

Known in the application as ‘Ora’, the project would be built behind the existing ‘Wynnum Shopping Centre’ and has been designed by Sarah Porter of Ivory Collective.

The project comprises of 275 one, two and three bedroom apartments as well as new retail and two levels of commercial space.

A full recreation level is planned for level 5 which includes a 528m2 restaurant and bar around a large pool terrace with wet deck, spa, sauna & steam rooms, private cabanas, cinema, bbqs, meeting rooms, wine rooms, gym and function rooms.

Advertisement
Artist's impression of Ora, Wynnum development
Artist’s impression of Ora, Wynnum development
Artist's impression of Ora, Wynnum development
Artist’s impression of Ora, Wynnum development
Artist's impression of Ora, Wynnum development
Artist’s impression of Ora, Wynnum development

“Wynnum CBD area has been left behind with no development occurring in the last 20 years. Land owners and businesses are left to struggle with reduced returns and trading days (5 if lucky) and reduced trading hours”.

“Most small businesses in the area lose money early week due to lack of volume and fixed overheads and struggle to make ends meet on weekends. Our project is to design to put Wynnum CBD on the “open for business” Map”.

“This landmark development, with a construction cost estimated at $130m will have a huge financial and community positive impact on the Wynnum CBD and surrounding areas”.

– HamBros Pty Ltd vision.

Artist's impression of Ora, Wynnum development
Artist’s impression of Ora, Wynnum development

The site sits within a ‘Major Centre Zone’ for Wynnum which allows for high density development. Detailed architectural rendering are still progressing and are currently shown as massing’s.

Project Rundown

  • Site area: 7,278m2
  • Number of residential apartments: x54 one bedrooms, x148 two bedrooms, x67 three bedrooms, x6 penthouses (x275 apartments total)
  • Building height: 26 levels + rooftop / 105m
  • Commercial space: 4,624m2
  • Retail space: 2,812m2
  • Lifts: x4 lifts (lift-ratio 1:67)
  • Communal space: 528m2 restaurant and bar around a large pool terrace with wet deck, spa, sauna & steam rooms, private cabanas, cinema, bbqs, meeting rooms, wine rooms, gym and function rooms
  • Car parking: x463 car spaces in total
  • Bicycle parking: x320 bike spaces
  • Developer: HamBros Pty Ltd
  • Architect: Ivory Collective
  • Town Planner: Gateway Survey & Planning
  • Sustainability: Deep planting proposed throughout. There is no planned provision for a rooftop solar PV system.
Proposed recreation deck level as part of Ora, Wynnum
Proposed recreation deck level as part of Ora, Wynnum

Plans

Proposed Plans Part-1

 

Tell us what you think about this masterplan below in the comment box. The development application for this project, available to view on Brisbane City Council’s Developmenti online platform is A006009368.

Subscribe to BrisbaneDevelopment.com here.

Advertisement
Mixed Use Tower With Hotel And Illuminated Facade Proposed For Main Street Kangaroo Point
Eight Storey Residential Project Proposed For 1181 Wynnum Road, Cannon Hill
New Five-Storey Mixed-Use Development Proposed for Wynnum
Mosaic’s Second Kangaroo Point Project Secures $205M in Pre-Sales
Approval Granted for 22-Storey Residential Tower at Kangaroo Point

Sign Up to BD Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking development news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Commenting Policy and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Email Copy Link Print
Share
What do you think?
Love1
Happy0
Surprise0
Sad0
Angry1
Previous Article Architectural rendering of updated design for Hilton Garden Inn, Spring Hill Updated Design for Spring Hill Project + New Hotel Operator
Next Article Artist's impression of Herston Private Hospital building Herston Private Hospital Now Completed Near RBWH
32 Comments
  • Craig Deveney says:
    18 May 2022 at 9:35 pm

    Great

    Reply
  • Anthony says:
    18 May 2022 at 11:13 pm

    Way out of proportion for the area.
    Uneconomical design – look at this corridor sizes!
    Very odd ground to level 4 concept and I don’t think a restaurant would do well on L5 of an apartment building.
    Overall a very poor design.

    Reply
  • David Bell says:
    18 May 2022 at 11:36 pm

    Unbelievably ugly box reminiscent of a 1960’s hospital. The few palm trees on the roof are a laughable nod to ‘buildings that breathe’ strategy. I guess its the start of sleepy Wynnum becoming Brisbane’s own Sunshine Coast.

    Reply
  • Greg says:
    19 May 2022 at 2:37 am

    Well it’s a nice concept design, but is it really that suitable for an outlying suburb like Wynnum? 27 stories is alot of height compared to the surrounding buildings; is there really a demand for tall tower high-density living so far from Brisbane CBD?

    I pity the marketing department who has to sell the idea of sardine-packed-high-density-unit living over cost-comparable 2 storey townhouses and lower density units in the same suburb… Watch this space for the inevitable redesign to meet council approval/ current market demands.

    Reply
  • Aden says:
    19 May 2022 at 3:40 am

    Looks cool and brisbane needs to grow

    Reply
  • Uncle Norm says:
    19 May 2022 at 9:23 am

    It’s total Crap. Leave things the way they’re are.
    Money grabbing developers and local councillors are greedy people. Why spoil an iconic part of our heritage?
    Profit before people.

    Reply
  • SherylThimios says:
    19 May 2022 at 9:38 am

    This is terrible .It will spoil Wynnum completely !!Far,far too high!!! It will be an eyesore .Wynnum has a charm .Dont spoilt it by putting up this gigantic monster of a building .Keep the unit towers at the height they are now.How can this be allowed ???

    Reply
  • Geoff says:
    19 May 2022 at 9:46 am

    First up, the developer’s claim that there has been no development in the Wynnum cbd is simply nonsense.

    Secondly, this proposed development is so far out of kilter with everything around it, it will be a permanent eyesore for the Wynnum community.

    There are plenty of ways to rejuvenate the Wynnum cbd without building a monolithic ghetto.

    Kick this to the curb.

    Reply
  • Con says:
    19 May 2022 at 10:03 am

    How shameful is this proposal?
    Take a look at Mitchelton on the Northside where developers destroyed a beautiful cosy street with an ugly monolith. We often travel to Wynnum with our grandkids on weekends and enjoy the unspoilt beauty of the place. Put up an ugly high rise building and the beauty is forever gone. Very sad

    Reply
  • Lou says:
    19 May 2022 at 10:09 am

    Yes, agree the Wynnum area desperately needs redevelopment, but not like this. The apartment design is ugly and the height of 27 floors is ridiculous. A monstrosity like this placed directly on the ridge line of Bay Terrace should not be allowed. It is horrible. Is this really the best we can do to enhance our area? This needs to be stopped. Surely there is a better way.

    Reply
  • Lou says:
    19 May 2022 at 10:21 am

    This is the most unsuitable monstrosity ever proposed for the area. Yes agree, the Wynnum area desperately needs redevelopment, but not like this. This is huge 27 floors of totally out-of-keeping ugliness. This development needs to be stopped immediately. Is this really the best we can do in this day and age?

    Reply
  • Keepitlegal says:
    19 May 2022 at 10:54 am

    This proposal is clearly in breach of the approved Wynnum—Manly neighbourhood plan as published by Brisbane City Council. It clearly does not meet the bayside style required by the plan and in no way fits in with the character or any bayside area. It is more than 3 times the allowable height. The proposal shows contempt for residents needs and the area as well as BCC planning direction.

    Reply
  • Basim Faraj says:
    19 May 2022 at 11:23 pm

    This proposal is total BS. I will fight this proposal tooth and nail with every possible legal way.

    This proposal will ruin our part of town and unique way of living.
    Such greedy and irresponsible council.
    SHAME ON YOU!

    Reply
  • Bert says:
    20 May 2022 at 2:07 am

    This is so out of proportion it’s just wrong. Sure develop the areas but something that isn’t a massive box that obstructs and detracts from the area.
    The code is there for a reason. And that reason is so that developers don’t build this.

    Reply
  • Doreen Barrie says:
    21 May 2022 at 1:24 am

    Aden you are obviously not a true Wynnumite.
    This building is wrong.
    Stop these money grabbing developers from spoiling our Wynnum.

    Reply
  • Lyndon wade says:
    21 May 2022 at 10:07 pm

    Utter rubbish.

    Reply
  • david aubrey says:
    22 May 2022 at 5:48 am

    This is a monolithic and architecturally moribund project proposed for a town centre that is starting to show recovery as an eclectic low rise living environment with boutique shops and cafes. Should never be allowed..

    Reply
  • Julie Aubrey says:
    22 May 2022 at 5:54 am

    This many levels in bayside Wynnum is a disgrace .It should be like Noosa with a height limitation . Maximum 6 to 10 levels .Our beautiful Bayside is going to resemble The Gold Coast .Australia has no idea how to keep places beautiful

    Reply
  • Shelly Dyer says:
    24 May 2022 at 6:51 am

    This is a architectural disgrace we don’t need this vulgar height in the middle of Wynnum

    Reply
  • Darren says:
    24 May 2022 at 11:32 pm

    Where is the environmental and social impact statement for such a disastrous scheme? Clearly no thought given to the surrounding environment or the residents of Wynnum. Business owners may benefit, but at what cost to the local area? Making money is not everything – NO TO THIS DEVELOPMENT!

    Reply
  • Peter S says:
    25 May 2022 at 9:06 am

    How do we show our disgust at Brisbane council for even letting this proposal break wind – two of the worst type of persons in today’s world are developers and estate agents both of whom have no concern for “Joe blow” and these are the people who make Wynnum what it is – so they can shove the BS – go away and leave us alone – we don’t want you or your money ideas

    Reply
  • Villager says:
    26 May 2022 at 2:21 am

    Just to bring some sanity to comments of ‘disgust’ against the ‘greedy and irresponsible’ council – this proposal has been submitted by a developer to council, council haven’t approved it and they probably haven’t even started their assessment of it yet.
    In the unlikely event that they ignore their own plan and approve it in its current form then yes, you could say they were irresponsible etc, but until then these comments make no sense.

    Reply
  • Robby says:
    1 August 2022 at 6:00 am

    As a local resident I object completely to this development. Council has agreed height restrictions which are imposed to the inch for new residential developments, but their seems to be a different rule for large developments. Citing the council’s passing of the Stratton Terrace development in Manly as an example. But this current proposal is on another level, (literally). We do not wish to live in the Gold Coast or we would be living there. Wynnum will not be revitalised by the addition of a monstrous slum of the future, shading great areas and changing the infrastructure of our community. Why do people flock to Manly on the weekend from the city? Not just because of the beautiful bay, but because they enjoy the market and the village atmosphere that Manly offers. Wynnum still has that atmosphere, but it will be lost if high rise developments are allowed. Byron Bay and Noosa are great examples of how keeping development low (in their case below the tree line), creates a wonderful living environment, allowing light and greenery to dominate the urban landscape. The lack of high-rise has in no way impeded the revitalisation of these towns, in fact they are extremely popular not just because of the beautiful beaches and scenery but because of the lack of concrete towers and thefeeling of closeness and community living that lowest development encourages. The Gold Coast highrise vision of life is not sustainable nor is conducive to a connectivity to the land we live in. Please Council have a vision for the future not based on profit and reject this development in consideration of future generations to come.

    Reply
  • Graham says:
    1 August 2022 at 8:14 am

    I love the idea of development but come on this is just plan ugly and way way to high. The plaza development yes great but this tower is all wrong.

    Reply
  • Nic says:
    5 August 2022 at 5:54 pm

    It is an unusual proposal for an area that doesn’t have any precedent to work with. If the local community are staunchly against it, one would presume a character area appraisal should be undertaken and thereafter see if any heritage, environmental, communal, and aesthetic values are impacted by this.

    Inevitably, I foresee such proposals coming and going, but the bottom line is that Wynnum is a desirable area for property demand and will continue as such.

    Perhaps the solution is to lower the amount of floors by 8-10 and seek to design a project that meets all the necessary requirements for sustainable property development for Brisbane’s subtropical environment.

    Reply
  • andrew de bruin says:
    28 August 2022 at 11:27 pm

    what a complete eyesore. One can only hope that the application for 27 stories is not an ambit claim hoping to be allowed 10-12! It’s happened before. This is not the Gold Coast and the argument for increasing weekend traffic to traders is ridiculous. Come and see what weekends are like in Wynnum. Go away HamBros

    Reply
  • Nic says:
    16 September 2022 at 3:41 am

    Such an atrocity! How shameful to even allow it to come to light. Go back to the drawing board. Wynnum does not need to be gentrified. It needs sustainable and affordable housing. Not eye sores that start at $1m for a studio!

    Reply
  • Loz S says:
    18 September 2022 at 8:32 pm

    Absolutely revolting. What a horrible thought. I failed to see how this eyesore adds anything but overcrowded living. Wynnum lacks the infrastructure to deal with a massive population explosion. This tower would end up being a massive eyesore to our beautiful bay! Shame on the people who even think this is ok!

    Reply
  • Roger says:
    15 March 2023 at 8:52 am

    I agree with everyone’s concerns over height. 27 stories is patently ridiculous and unsuited to the area. I assume it is a ploy to negotiate with Council to get approval for as many as they can get. I’d be comfortable for an approval of up to 8 stories so long as the overall effect is not the Soviet style atrocity being proposed. What an awful design.
    If approval is achieved for significantly higher then there will be serious questions to be answered Mr Council. I think, as residents, we should now be engaging our local and state members.

    Reply
  • Douglas Brewer says:
    13 November 2023 at 1:35 am

    The sewer pipe down Charlott St wont cope & electricity mains wont cope A double BROWN OUT you also need a proof reader & please tell mewhat are all the tower cranes doing ? catching pigeons ! DID they teach Ethics where YOU learnt architecture or did YOU skip class NO DEVELOPMENT IN 20 YEARS B.S. =bovine excrement

    Reply
  • Matt Rossiter says:
    26 February 2024 at 5:13 am

    Ivory seems to have got the feedback needed to slide out version 2.0 Left hand watch the right hand lol….

    Reply
  • Warren Mcauley says:
    2 September 2024 at 6:43 pm

    Get the fuk out of wynnum you greedmonger morons , you clowns are ruining wynnum locals cant use our beach area because of ignorant clowns.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay Connected

13kFollowersLike
2kFollowersFollow
6.2kFollowersFollow
3.2kSubscribersSubscribe
LinkedInFollow
Advertisement

Latest News

Architectural rendering of the proposed DD Resort Living development at 60 Marine Parade, Southport.
$1.5 Billion Over 55 Resort Living Proposal Lodged For Southport Broadwater
Featured Gold Coast Residential
5 March 2026
Architectural rendering of the proposed five storey mixed use development at 123-125 Racecourse Road, Ascot showing the articulated facade, vertical screening elements and integrated planting.
Five Storey Mixed Use Development Proposed For 123-125 Racecourse Road, Ascot
Northern Residential
3 March 2026
Architectural rendering of the external built form of the proposed 17 Hamilton Place mixed use tower at the corner of Hamilton Place and Campbell Street, Bowen Hills.
28 Storey Residential Tower Proposed For Hamilton Place, Bowen Hills
Featured Northern Residential
1 March 2026
Architectural rendering of the Brisbane Place commercial tower at 131 Edward Street
Brisbane Place DA Update: Minor Change Seeks Taller Crown And Core Reconfiguration
Brisbane CBD Commercial Featured
25 February 2026

Polls

Select two infrastructure projects needed most ahead of the Brisbane 2032 Olympics

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
//

Brisbane’s leading source of free development and infrastructure news reporting across the greater Brisbane area.

Quick Link

  • ADVERTISE WITH USNew
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • COMMENTING POLICY
  • CONTACT US
  • MY BOOKMARK

Top Categories

  • BRISBANE DEVELOPMENT MAP
  • BRISBANE CBD
  • QUEEN’S WHARF
  • BRISBANE 2032 OLYMPICS
  • SMART GROWTH SERIES

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Brisbane DevelopmentBrisbane Development
Follow US
© 2026 Brisbane Development Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Join Us!
Subscribe to the BrisbaneDevelopment.com newsletter and never miss our latest news.
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.