There is no denying it, most Brisbane people dislike King George Square. It is concrete, hot, and bland. Council argues that the current concrete slab serves as a great space for seasonal pop up events and commercial installations, but at what cost? Can a balance be struck to achieve a design that caters for moments like the lighting of the Christmas tree while still providing Brisbane with a genuinely enjoyable public space for the other 95 percent of the year?
The issue is not only one of functionality, but of philosophy. For decades, Brisbane has pursued the language of modernism without thinking about the warmth or civic grace that classical design once brought to public places. In doing so, the city has traded detail for efficiency and permanence for expedience. The result is a landscape of minimalism without memory, spaces that are clean but characterless, useful but unloved.
Across Europe, there is a noticeable shift back toward architecture with character and permanence. Countries like Poland, Germany and the Netherlands are reviving traditional building styles, and in Budapest the National Hauszmann Program is taking that idea even further. Entire palaces and civic buildings are being rebuilt in classical form, not as nostalgic replicas, but as new public landmarks designed for contemporary use. It shows what can happen when a government decides that beauty, craftsmanship and identity still matter in a modern city.
Reintroducing classical design principles does not mean turning the city into a museum piece. It means rediscovering proportion, symmetry, rhythm, and a sense of human scale. It means creating places that are not only practical but emotionally resonant, spaces that uplift rather than simply accommodate. City Hall endures because it embodies these timeless qualities. It is grounded, beautiful, and built to last.
King George Square should reflect that same pride. Instead, it has become a flat expanse of stone that feels more like a transport interchange than the heart of a capital city. What Brisbane needs now is not just a redesign, but a rediscovery of beauty. By blending classical order with contemporary sustainability, the city could finally reclaim a civic square that feels both timeless and distinctly Brisbane.

The current square feels designed to survive rather than inspire. Functionally, it works, the buses run beneath, and the events still happen, but it is a space shaped by engineering rather than livability. It offers little shade, limited seating, and almost no water elements to offset the subtropical heat. For most of the year, it sits empty, radiating warmth back into the city like a tiled frying pan.
Cities such as Singapore and Seoul have shown what can be achieved when civic ambition meets climate intelligence. So why does Brisbane keep settling for mediocrity?
The 2008 redesign cost $28 million and gave us more concrete, not more character. This is a city with the climate, setting and cultural momentum to create something truly world class.
Each of the following ideas imagines how King George Square could transform into a civic heart worthy of City Hall, spaces where classical architecture, greenery, and water combine to create comfort, beauty, and a sense of belonging.
Editor’s Note
Brisbane Development incorporates AI-generated imagery to visualise design concepts. All ideas are independently conceived and editorially produced.
A Green Classical Heart for Brisbane’s CBD



The concept design proposes a substantial reshaping of King George Square, replacing much of the existing hard paved surface with water gardens, stepped pools and programmable fountains. A central circular platform becomes the primary event space, while shallow water edges and stepping stones introduce informal pedestrian routes through the square. The design integrates more shade and subtropical planting to improve comfort and soften the space, while maintaining City Hall as the visual anchor.
Two new curved colonnade structures frame the square, each accommodating cafés or small hospitality tenancies at ground level with shaded rooftop terraces above. Their sandstone form echoes the architecture of City Hall, extending its presence into the public realm. These activated edges overlook the water features and create new vantage points across the space.
Together, the elements signal a shift toward a cooler, more recreational civic environment, with water gardens, planting and flexible event areas designed for everyday use as well as seasonal programming.
The proposal also raises a broader question about how civic spaces should serve a growing city. Large open plazas accommodate occasional major events, yet they often sit underused for much of the year. Conversely, spaces shaped for shade, water and everyday comfort support continuous public life but reduce the footprint available for one off gatherings. This concept leans toward the latter, suggesting that trading some event capacity can yield a square that genuinely works for people 95 percent of the year, rather than being defined primarily by infrequent spectacles or paid marketing campaigns.
City Hall Heritage Fountains

This concept proposes reimagining King George Square as a civic garden framed by architecture that speaks the same language as City Hall, sandstone colonnades, arched windows, and formal symmetry. Rather than competing with the heritage landmark, this design celebrates it by building new old style architecture that complements its character.
Tall shade trees form a green canopy leading directly toward the clock tower, while a long central water feature introduces reflection, movement, and cooling. The sound of water replaces the current echo of concrete, softening the atmosphere and reconnecting the square to its human scale.


New sandstone pavilions on either side restore enclosure to the space, housing shaded cafés, bars, and a proper Brisbane Information Centre that finally gives the city a dedicated civic welcome point that isn’t an afterthought. A central water feature provides movement and cooling, with fountains that can be turned off during major events to retain full flexibility. This ensures the square stays functional without losing its everyday atmosphere.
Together, these new buildings create a true civic courtyard that feels welcoming and alive throughout the day. The City Hall Heritage Fountain concept proves that boldness does not always mean futuristic form, sometimes the most radical thing a city can do is rediscover elegance.
Structural constraints are often raised as a reason why King George Square cannot support anything more substantial, since the existing design was kept lightweight to sit above the car park below. But when there is genuine civic ambition, these challenges do not have to dictate the outcome. If creating a world class public space requires additional structural support, then sacrificing a small number of car spaces in the basement to accommodate new footings is hardly an unreasonable trade. Cities that value their public realm find solutions rather than excuses, and Brisbane should be no different.
The Active Square


This concept envisions King George Square as a layered civic garden where heritage and modernity coexist. The design respects the classical lines of City Hall while introducing contemporary elements that soften and cool the space.
A central reflecting pool anchors the plaza, bordered by fountains that provide both sound and motion. Textured stone surfaces replace the glare of bare concrete, while subtropical plantings bring vibrancy and resilience. Above, a sweeping elevated walkway draped in vines forms a living canopy, offering shade, new viewpoints, and a framework for art installations or lighting.

Curved pavilions on either side mirror City Hall’s materials and rhythm, housing cafés that activate the square throughout the day. The open central spine remains clear for civic traditions like the Christmas tree lighting. The Living Square shows how design rooted in classical balance can still feel progressive, a civic space that feels alive without losing its identity.
The Garden Terrace Square

This concept reimagines King George Square with large mature trees that form a continuous shaded canopy, while curved stone terraces descend toward a water feature that anchors the space.
A shallow circular pool with playful jets introduces sound, movement, and cooling, and the tiered layout improves seating, accessibility, and visibility for events. What is now a flat, sunbaked expanse becomes a cooler, more human scaled plaza shaped for everyday use as well as civic gatherings.

Elegant pavilion buildings frame the edges of the square, echoing City Hall’s rhythm through sandstone toned colonnades, arched windows, and green facades. These pavilions house cafés, community spaces, and shaded outdoor seating that bring daily activity back into the square.
A vertical green wall adds texture and cooling, while layered subtropical planting softens the architecture and reinforces Brisbane’s sub-tropical identity. Together, the terraces, water features, trees, and classical inspired pavilions transform the square into a living extension of City Hall, a civic heart defined by symmetry, shade, water, and fine grained architectural detail.

The path forward lies in flexibility and imagination, creating a space that can host thousands of people one night and still feel intimate enough for a lunchtime coffee the next day. This means introducing shade, trees, and water while maintaining an open civic core for major gatherings.
But beyond practicality, Brisbane needs to rediscover beauty. A new design of King George Square is due and should not only solve heat and usability, but also reawaken the city’s architectural spirit. Classical principles such as proportion, rhythm, and permanence can guide that process. They remind us that public spaces are not just backdrops for events, but expressions of civic pride.
Across all of these concept directions, there is a common thread: every idea, whether focused on greenery, water, heritage, experience, or performance, acknowledges that the square must become more human. A new square design needs to recognise that shade, comfort, identity, and a sense of place are non-negotiable if King George Square is ever going to feel like the civic heart of Brisbane rather than a thoroughfare. The debate is not about style; it is about raising expectations.
City Hall has stood for nearly a century because it was built with intent, craftsmanship, and belief in the value of beauty. The square in front of it should aspire to the same standard. By blending timeless architectural values with modern sustainability, Brisbane has the chance to create a civic space that looks forward while honouring the past, a place that feels not temporary, but enduring.
These ideas show that boldness does not have to mean experimental minimalism. It can mean building something dignified, beautiful and lasting, something that future generations will still look at and think, “they actually got that one right.”
So the question is not whether we can fix King George Square. It is whether we will ever choose to.
Because really, at some point Brisbane has to stop saying “yeah… that’ll do” and start asking, “why can’t we have world class civic spaces in this city?”













Finally, someone presents a BOLD VISION for Brisbane’s decaying concrete square. I can only hope that the Council has the fortitude to pursue this imaginative and powerful fix for our city. Thank you, Brisbane Development.
Get rid of the carpark and the busway under KGS and then structurally and from a feasibility point of view you can start to think about all of these ideas.
Thanks for the AI solutions that historically and currently can never be delivered. It’s easy to make beautiful images of a
place but fail to address actual site constraints and fiscal responsibility.
Always good to debate urban outcomes but we have much more important things to do in the city at the moment.
While it would have been valuable to see hand-drawn, human-led sketches, the AI-generated concepts nonetheless demonstrate strong potential for how this space could be used in a climatically appropriate manner.
King George Square should be Olympic Central, a place that people will see on television across the world for 15 days straight. A place that will inspire them to dream of visiting Brisbane. The current ugly grey mess does not. I really hope that this inspires the council to start a serious discussion into redeveloping the square.
I love that everything develops out from the front of the City Hall instead of from left to right. This makes so much sense, and the designs are worth considering.
Well done for putting this together.
They are astonishing — and not in a good way. King George Square is already struggling, and these concepts look like the result of a half-hour panic session on someone’s favourite AI toy, followed by absolutely no critical thought whatsoever.
Agreed.
Can these models be redone without the tall trees present? It’s highly unlikely they’ll exist as (a) there’s not enough soil to get them to grow (the carpark roof is beneath) and (b) by the time they reach the maturity seen in these concepts, King George Square will have been ripped up and remodelled.
These are nice ideas, but they should incorporate the physical limitations of the site (carpark roof beneath cannot take heavy sandstone block building weight.) Perhaps present this concept with shallow garden planter box beds where you’re showing neo-classical buildings, or relocate these buildings to areas outside of the carpark roof (i.e. where the existing cafe/ restaurant buildings are.) It would be nice to see a practical reworking of the square to compare apples-to-apples.
As an architect who uses the square daily, I actually really love the open-ness of the space. Every day there is something going on. Its a civic plaza, as it should be. The pub plays a supporting role, but doesn’t dominate the experience. If you watch what happens in that square, you’ll realize how many people actually pass through it in just a few minutes. Over developing it like Chat GPT seems to think we should do, isn’t going to work at all and we’ll loose one of the few open gathering spaces we’ve got. I also fundamentally disagree with a regression in architectural styles. Architecture evolves, just like people and culture…it’s the original and most tangible meme.
Non of these options are desirable, less is more. Simplicity is the key, real grass, trees or other structures for shade, seating which is welcoming, art installations that compliments city hall and lastly space for civic /commercial events. Get rid of tenancy and that big screen, eye sore- visual pollution, provides no benefits other than lame council blah , odd news and occasionally used to key sporting events which at times you need broadcasting rights. And that mezzanine level viewing deck attracts anti social behaviour and don’t forget that wonderful water feature that has no trickle of water and you wouldn’t even know that there’s a speakers corner.
I would definitely like to see a lot more lawn and a few shade trees not over done. So people can use the area sit and have lunch meet up and be able to admire the great architecture of the Hall.
The first concept is by far the best, but makes no sense to do it at KGS. Would work perfectly at queens gardens/treasury hotel
This has to be a joke.