By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Commenting Policy.
Accept
Brisbane DevelopmentBrisbane DevelopmentBrisbane Development
  • Areas
    • Brisbane CBD
    • Northern
    • Southern
    • Eastern
    • Western
    • Gold Coast
    • Sunshine Coast
  • Search by Type
    • Residential
    • Residential BTR
    • Commercial
    • Hotel & Resort
    • Brisbane Retail
    • Entertainment / Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Concepts
    • Industrial
  • SEQ Development Maps
    • Brisbane Development Map
    • Gold Coast Development Map
  • Major Precincts
    • Brisbane Airport
    • Brisbane 2032 Olympics
    • Northshore Hamilton
    • Queen’s Wharf Precinct
    • Waterfront Brisbane
    • Woolloongabba / Brisbane Live Precinct
Search
  • Advertise
© 2025 Brisbane Development Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Reading: Design update proposed for Queen’s Wharf precinct 3
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Brisbane DevelopmentBrisbane Development
  • Areas
  • Search by Type
  • SEQ Development Maps
  • Major Precincts
Search
  • Areas
    • Brisbane CBD
    • Northern
    • Southern
    • Eastern
    • Western
    • Gold Coast
    • Sunshine Coast
  • Search by Type
    • Residential
    • Residential BTR
    • Commercial
    • Hotel & Resort
    • Brisbane Retail
    • Entertainment / Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Concepts
    • Industrial
  • SEQ Development Maps
    • Brisbane Development Map
    • Gold Coast Development Map
  • Major Precincts
    • Brisbane Airport
    • Brisbane 2032 Olympics
    • Northshore Hamilton
    • Queen’s Wharf Precinct
    • Waterfront Brisbane
    • Woolloongabba / Brisbane Live Precinct
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2024 Brisbane Development Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Brisbane Development > Development Areas > Brisbane CBD > Design update proposed for Queen’s Wharf precinct 3
Brisbane CBDQueens Wharf Precinct

Design update proposed for Queen’s Wharf precinct 3

Published: 24 February 2021
15 Comments
Share
7 Min Read
Eastern aerial view of Queen's Wharf precinct 3
Eastern aerial view of Queen's Wharf precinct 3
SHARE

A development application has been submitted by Destination Brisbane Consortium for a change of design to Queen’s Wharf precinct 3, also known as the residential precinct near Parliament House.

Contents
Setback transitionBellevue Plaza

The proposed amendments to the original application impact Precinct 3, and predominantly involve changing the land usage, mix and designs of towers 5 and 6.

According to Destination Brisbane Consortium, the introduction of a potential commercial tower for Queen’s Wharf aims to diversify the uses of the precinct by providing an opportunity for a commercial building to be located immediately adjacent to 1 William Street which is the largest commercial building in Brisbane by both height and floor space.

Destination Brisbane Consortium (DBC) proposes these changes to keep its options open due to the possibility of shifting market conditions.

Advertisement
North east aerial view of Queen's Wharf precinct 3
North east aerial view of Queen’s Wharf precinct 3
Map of precinct 3 within the wider Queen's Wharf precinct
Map of precinct 3 within the wider Queen’s Wharf precinct
Northbound view from Riverside Expressway
Northbound view from Riverside Expressway
Western aerial view
Western aerial view
Corner of Alice and William Streets
Corner of Alice and William Streets
Mansions Lane from Margaret Street
Mansions Lane from Margaret Street
Alice Lane from 1 William Forecourt
Alice Lane from 1 William Forecourt

There has been no change to the maximum building height provision which is 274m AHD for tower 5 and 195m AHD for tower 6 however the Queen’s Wharf Priority Development Area (PDA) falls within state government planning control, and therefore the exact heights of buildings can often remain completely unknown to the public until completion.

Artist's impression of the original design for precinct 3 of Queens Wharf
Artist’s impression of the original design for precinct 3 of Queen’s Wharf

Application documents submitted to Economic Development Queensland show that tower 5 and 6 which were previously all residential will now possibly include commercial space.

Building 6, the closest building to Parliament House is a key contender to become a commercial-only building.

George Street building presence
George Street building presence

Tower 5 is now proposed to be mixed-use and could contain commercial or retail space on the lower levels with residential in the mid and high rise sections of the building. This differs from tower 4, a cylinder shaped residential-only tower which is currently under construction and mooted to be 90% sold.

Advertisement
Queen's Wharf skyline elevation diagram
Queen’s Wharf skyline elevation diagram

Massing documentation in the application show that tower 5 now appears to be a tower of maximum height, compared to the original artist impressions of the residential scheme. In Brisbane, due to airport radar shadowing issues, the maximum building height is 274.3 metres. Illustrations of tower 5 shows the proposed structure surpassing the top of the 1 William Street’s spire which is 259.8m AHD high.

“Currently, Precinct 3 within the PoD is generally referred to as the ‘residential precinct’. The proposed PoD amendments do not seek to alter the original intent of Precinct 3, maintaining a significant component of residential GFA within the Precinct” – Urbis for Destination Brisbane Consortium.

Queen's Wharf built form diagram
Queen’s Wharf built form diagram

The built form and floor plates of towers 5 and 6 appear to have been altered from the curvilinear nature of the previous design, similar to Towers 1 and 4. Progressively as you move along George Street towards Parliament House, the towers will evolve into a more rectangular form.

Setback transition

Designed by Cottee Parker, the now much shorter tower 6 will feature a setback transition as part of its façade design in order to enhance the view towards Parliament House.

Advertisement
Corner of Alice Street and George Street
Corner of Alice Street and George Street
Corner of George & Margaret Street
Sketch of residential option for tower 6
Sketch of residential option for tower 6
Sketch of commercial option for tower 6
Sketch of commercial option for tower 6

In order to facilitate this change, amendments to ground plan design relating to the proposed ‘Ribbon’ pedestrian laneway alignment as well as the removal of a retail pavilion from Bellevue Plaza is proposed.

According to the application, the primary purpose of the setback transition is to ensure that visibility of Parliament House is maintained from George Street

Bellevue Plaza

Architectural rendering of proposed Bellevue Plaza
Architectural rendering of proposed Bellevue Plaza

The proposed amendments seek to remove the individual retail tenancy component approved within Bellevue Plaza.

The retail component is to be removed to allow for enhanced viewsheds to surrounding heritage aspects through the sites and increase amenity of the public realm as well as provide clear sightlines through a space that is purely dedicated to pedestrian movement.

Context considerations of Bellevue Plaza
Context considerations of Bellevue Plaza
Context considerations of Bellevue Plaza
Context considerations of Bellevue Plaza
Precinct 3 map
Precinct 3 map
Site context
Site context
Bellevue Plaza elevations
Bellevue Plaza elevations

Bellevue Plaza will provide a minimum size of 900m2 of public realm space consisting of 350m2 of turf and 100m2 of plantings.

According to documents, the changes aim to create a finer ground public realm by reinstating Bellevue Plaza as a key northeast facing urban and civic space fronting key heritage spaces and new contemporary spaces.

“Bellevue Plaza will provide a space that promotes lingering in the space, while the ground floor plane will be better activated with active uses such as retail and food & drink outlets. The remainder of the public realm will comprise lush landscaping, shade trees and urban greenery.” – Urbis for Destination Brisbane Consortium.

A lightweight colonnade screen is proposed to wrap around Bellevue Plaza to act as a threshold into the space and marking the location of the former hotel boundary alignment.

Axonometric of Bellevue Plaza
Axonometric of Bellevue Plaza
Bellevue Hotel Colonnade
Bellevue Hotel Colonnade

Additionally, the application also seeks to remove a proposed tunnel which was originally planned to connect Queen’s Wharf Integrated Resort with Precinct 3’s basements.

“DBC has determined that this will no longer be pursued and therefore is proposed to be removed. The inclusion of the tunnel in the approved PoD was for the purpose of convenience and it is not relied upon for the development to operate as intended.” – Urbis for Destination Brisbane Consortium.

Tell us what you think about this development below in the comment box. The development application for this project, available to view on Economic Development Queensland’s Planning & Development Online is #DEV2017/846.

US Burger Giant Wendy’s Proposes Flagship Venue in Brisbane CBD
New $750m Tower Over Cross River Rail Station Secures Key Government Tenant
Major Testing Underway for New Adelaide Street Underground Busway Tunnel
450 Queen St Tower Undergoes Major Carbon-Cutting Retrofit
Grand Stair and Revamped Facades Highlight New HSW Proposal Amendments

Sign Up to BD Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking development news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Commenting Policy and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Email Copy Link Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Happy0
Surprise0
Sad0
Angry0
Previous Article Harris Lane Retail soon to be occupied by DFS Queen’s Wharf secures retail giant DFS for luxury shopping precinct
Next Article Architectural rendering of Ferny Grove Central retail Honeycombes unveils plans for $140 million Ferny Grove Central
15 Comments
  • Frank says:
    25 February 2021 at 4:33 am

    All development is disappointing from the beginning most of the information I was told it’s not true. I would not trust them anything anymore.

    Reply
  • Ant says:
    26 February 2021 at 11:41 am

    One of the reason they being approved is because their overall unique design, but now their changing things from the original plan.. bit disappointed though. Brisbane will never be in world map with so so design.

    Reply
  • Peter says:
    1 March 2021 at 7:52 am

    People bought an apartment between 50 and 64th floor so they get a view of botanical Garden and now they won’t have a view anywhere, maybe from window to window. Good job Destination Brisbane Consortium????

    Reply
  • Anthony says:
    4 March 2021 at 7:30 am

    Yikes . It looks like an back side of a mega liner. What are they thinking. Be better just having building 6 back the 30 metres and flat then that arse hanging out.
    Now to the Bellevue site. It’s going to look like a scaffold. Again what are these designers thinking ????.
    Not much to be honest. Maybe they should build an entrance tunnel and wall it around with a faux Bellevue Hotel balconies cause it’s got to look better then that rubbish.
    State Government need to step in and fix this URGENTLY.

    Reply
  • David Rudd says:
    4 March 2021 at 11:23 pm

    Another watered down, value managed Brisbane development.

    Reply
  • Russell says:
    6 March 2021 at 12:10 pm

    What happened to the Bellevue Hotel rebuild on the site?

    Reply
  • Peter P says:
    16 March 2021 at 6:15 am

    It’s all about pretty diagrams for today’s architects. Nothing to do with pretty architecture, I dare I say functional design.

    Reply
  • johan scheepers says:
    17 March 2021 at 11:20 am

    whats the point of a dumpy little 15 story building is a development like that?

    Reply
  • Ash says:
    23 May 2021 at 5:04 pm

    Are they seriously submitting a proposal to build this hideous building? I don’t want it to become a part of Brisbane landmarks and tarnishes the city skyline.
    It’s such a joke having a tall ugly skyscraper right behind Brisbane city hall.
    Any way to protest against it?

    Reply
  • John says:
    9 June 2021 at 8:40 am

    I vote for a rebuild of the Bellevue Hotel.

    Reply
  • Ann says:
    18 July 2021 at 2:13 pm

    This ugly disgusting design of tower 5 is going to ruin the queens wharf project.
    I can’t believe they want to build monstrous buildings on Brisbane’s beautiful riverside next to those historical buildings.

    Reply
  • Cayden says:
    10 October 2021 at 8:11 pm

    Not sure why people are not liking it, the new design blends in very well with the area it is in, it’s also better to have one large tower than two of them.

    Reply
  • Brisbane resident says:
    13 December 2021 at 8:55 pm

    This new design looks terrible. I don’t think Star would have won the contract if they had of submitted this as their original design.

    Reply
  • Maria says:
    31 July 2022 at 11:01 pm

    Yuck. Wtf

    Reply
  • T5V4MTCFWNX www.yandex.ru says:
    30 August 2022 at 7:22 pm

    T5V4MTCFWNX http://www.yandex.ru

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay Connected

13kFollowersLike
2kFollowersFollow
6.2kFollowersFollow
3.2kSubscribersSubscribe
LinkedInFollow
Advertisement

Latest News

Architectural rendering showing the façade detail and curved balcony forms of The Carter
Mosaic’s Second Kangaroo Point Project Secures $205M in Pre-Sales
Eastern Featured Residential
11 July 2025
Architectural rendering of the proposed Chester & Morse development showing dual tower form.
Frasers Lodges Design Change for Chester & Morse Towers in Newstead
Featured Northern Residential
6 July 2025
Architectural rendering of the external built form of the proposed Symphony project
Sherpa Unveils ‘Symphony’, a 27-Storey Tower for Cordelia Street
4101 - South Bank, South Brisbane, West End Featured Residential Southern
4 July 2025
Location of the proposed Brisbane Live Arena (left) and conceptual rendering of the original Arena at old Roma Street location
Brisbane Live Construction at Woolloongabba Could Commence by End of 2026
Brisbane 2032 Olympics Entertainment / Leisure Featured Woolloongabba / Brisbane Live Precinct
4 July 2025

Polls

Select two infrastructure projects needed most ahead of the Brisbane 2032 Olympics

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
//

Brisbane’s leading source of free development and infrastructure news reporting across the greater Brisbane area.

Quick Link

  • ADVERTISE WITH USNew
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • COMMENTING POLICY
  • CONTACT US
  • MY BOOKMARK

Top Categories

  • BRISBANE DEVELOPMENT MAP
  • BRISBANE CBD
  • QUEEN’S WHARF
  • BRISBANE 2032 OLYMPICS
  • SMART GROWTH SERIES

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Brisbane DevelopmentBrisbane Development
Follow US
© 2025 Brisbane Development Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Join Us!
Subscribe to the BrisbaneDevelopment.com newsletter and never miss our latest news.
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.